It’s only fitting The New York Post wrote this piece, I got stars versus spectacles from Cindy Adams. This is what she meant.
Gwyneth Paltrow, star.
Kim Kardashian, spectacle.
Meghan Markle, spectacle.
Spectacles are clout chasers, who will do anything for attention, anything. They don’t have the star power or talent to keep our interest. Lying isn’t beneath them, like that bogus car chase emulating Princess Diana’s fatal crash. Markle is full of shit, she’s totally down with racism if it benefits her lackluster acting career. She nor her mama had a problem hanging out with the racist Kardashian Jenners. It’s just funny, because if you weren’t a failed Princess, they wouldn’t acknowledge you. The title is the only way she’s relevant, and she fucked that up. She’s a hypocrite, a clown and a joke, just like Kim Kardashian, another boring basic bitch who has to make shit up for attention. The stars really lowered themselves for criminal spectacles.
A shame, that Gwyneth Paltrow thought they made her relevant. Y’all really let them numbers fool you into thinking we valued them more. We don’t. As you can see by this iconic ski trial we all tuned into. Quality over quantity. E! Wouldn’t have dropped their asses if they were riveting. No wonder they copy me, down to who they’re dating. I’m fascinating, original, a movie, you could never. No wonder they needed Kanye West. Once a spectacle, always a spectacle. You don’t have a place in The Athenian Age, the gatekeepers failed, they’ll be replaced. Via: NY Post